Turns out that trading drugs for guns in the 11th Circuit will qualify for prosecution under 18 u.s.c. 924(c), for "possession" as opposed to "use" of a firearm. Seems reasonable. Good on ya Pryor!
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I could swear that's not new. Seems "in furtherance" would sure include using it as currency. Finally Chef, the 11th got it right? big day!
2 comments:
I could swear that's not new. Seems "in furtherance" would sure include using it as currency. Finally Chef, the 11th got it right? big day!
This blog sucks!
Post a Comment